The dwf export is more raw and broken down and may not have everything. nwc export the information on a MEP element is just more structured, logical and straight forward in Navis' properties pallets, much like Revit's instance and type structure. To expand on the element properties a bit, with an. dwfx files if you want to see system colors in Navisworks as you see them in Revit." nwc format is most common and typically desired when coordinating with third parties. 4) Will not include grids or room names.Įxporting to. 3) Cannot export using shared coordinates. 2) Element properties are less logical and doesn't include all information. 2) Smaller file size, about third the size. All of Revit’s Visibility Graphics including system colors and transparencies are honored in Navis. Pros: 1) How you see the view in Revit is how you’ll see it in Navis. dwfx file can be opened directly with Navisworks. Colors are determined by the each elements material. Cons: 1) Pipe and duct colors are not displayed in Revit colors. 3) Can export using Revit’s internal (origin-to-origin) or shared coordinates. Pros: 1) Elements can be categorized per level or by the building as a whole. ".Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.Įxporting using the Navisworks Export add-in tool will create a. Here's an excerpt from our user manual on the differences between.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |